大使館の一覧
Dear ambassador
Petition
Please submit a statement to “the United Nations” and “ambassador Ian Burney” for 2018 G7 in Charlevoix Canada. that the following 4 points for “children’s happiness pursuit rights”. We will beg to pray. We hope to solve "the Japanese child abduction" that the world issue a importance manifesto. Thanks you in advance.
1, The Japanese government should admit the sin of one parent taking away children.
One parent taking away children is not guilty, but another parent taking return children in Joint custody is guilty. It is an illuminated omission that appreciates real control right as a character of “the sole custody”.
2, Japanese government must adopt that abolishes “the Sole Custody System” And should be change to "the joint custody system and Joint Parental Authority system".
Because the “sole custody system” cannot protect the child’s welfare, the best interests and the human rights and well-being of child. This system can not comply with “the Hague Convention”. Given the essence of "United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child", it contravenes children's international compliance.
3. Japanese government must adopt an essential new law "a system of the court-appointed defense counsel for child by divorce".
Child affected by divorce have the right to protect themselves. Compliance with the given the essence of "Convention on the Rights of the Child”, it is a necessary system to prevent trafficking of children, child’s rights violations and child abuse.
4. Japanese government must adopt an essential new law “Prevention for children Trafficking and Trading".
"Child trafficking by one parent" is admitted publicly in Japan.one parent negotiate profits and rights after detaining children in Japan. Because Japanese government don't determine the sin of kidnapping taking away children who have not agreed and no assent.Obviously, Japanese government has infringed the child's right.
Children are crying, they cannot meet the parent that wants to meet.
We are extremely grateful ambassadors of the EU that issued a statement to the Japanese government not complying with the Hague Convention. (Attached document)
On May 16, 2018, the US Department of State approved Japan as a “Noncompliance country" of obligation based on the "Hague Convention" of taking away problems after questioning "there is no effective means of enforcing orders" did. (Attached document)
Based on the "United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child", maintenance that respects the independent rights of the child has not been done and it is not wise. “The Hague Convention” is not effective in “the sole custody system”, so there is an important harm as to the child's free intention and as to the return of children.
Originally, taking away children who do not agree is not a separation. It is a one-sided separation and is a kidnapping. However, even if my one parent takes child away without consent from another parent or child, Japanese government will not judge kidnapping in Japan. When taking a child across countries of the Hague Convention member countries, Japanese government judge whether or not it violates “The Hague Convention”. Japanese government will not judge kidnapping. In other words, if child cross the country of the non-Hague treaty country, Japanese government judge that it does not violate “The Hague Convention” . Of course, kidnapping in japan also does not violate“The Hague Convention”.
Despite this harmful influence, in cases where taking parent refused to comply with court return orders, there were no effective means to enforce the order, resulting in a pattern of noncompliance.
Japanese government has been accepted as official standard, trafficking to negotiate profits and rights after kidnapping or abducting in Japan. The spiritual abuse of children affected by divorce is ignored and the Japanese judiciary infringes the rights of children openly. But the legislation to protect children rights has not been made.so it is not wise.
The cause of this problem will not be solved unless parents compliance of right are revised into “the joint custody system”
In “the sole custody system”, Japanese government will respect one parent's right who took child away. Because Japanese government look the real custody and real control right that one parent have it. Japanese government do not look another parent's right. In other words, it is a system that respects the rights of kidnappers.
Children separated from another parent will a mental disorder that becomes a parental loss syndrome.
Another parent that a child was kidnapped wills a mental disorder that becomes a child loss syndrome.
"The joint custody system" is an international law, protecting the rights of children and parents. Parents have the right to protect their children's future with their own hands and "the sole custody system" that deprives them of their rights cannot be Justice.
In order to protect the right of the child, we are strongly demand it to the Japanese Government. It abolished "the sole custody system" and is to shift to "the joint custody system". The right to receive affection from the parents, the right to grow with being loved, the right to be kept beside the parent, the right to wish stability of the heart with be hugged by two parent, Their right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness shall should be respected.
For that purpose, widely disseminate this Japanese fact, we want cooperation of ambassador.
Our group concerns the kidnapping of children of Asian countries due to mother’s divorce. It is a problem that Japanese father takes away the child that is without the consent of mother. Japanese one parent takes away the child against the will of the child, but he will not be a crime. Japanese judiciary deprives custody and Joint Parental Authority from mother, children are lost mother and takes away the right to be loved while feeling warmth by mother.
Children in the non-Hague treaty country and children in Japan are not respecting fundamental human rights, and inactions are occurring. If experts in the world see Japanese trafficking in children, abduction issues, human rights violations, they can be clearly understood.
Childs torn apart with another parent have mental damage.
Japanese government do Ignoring the evaluation, there is an adverse effect against the "United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child".
The Japanese government has overlooked that "the sole custody system" intensifies conflicts between parents, causing childhood kidnapping and causing children to get involved in conflict. The father who kidnapped the child, openly asking the mother for the benefits such as child support expenses, custody rights etc in the court, and the hostage negotiation is done.
The Japanese judicial decision which gives a judgment giving the requested profits and rights to father abducting child is assisting child trafficking.
Furthermore, considering the another parent’s rights, fundamental human rights are never respected, such as judicial deprivation of children and making it Influence even on the voyaging to Japan. The Japanese government, which does not resolve without looking at this inaction, may lack human rights sensation.
Especially, the Japanese government avoids deterioration of parents' trust relationship, and gives priority to mental damage of abductees. Therefore, ignoring mental damage of children at infancy at all, judicial decision regard the child's welfare as going to see him freely after the child adults. Children need to be affectionate from their parents when they are young, and principles both paternal and maternal are necessary for healthy growth of the heart (well-being).
Therefore, the Japanese government should review maintenance and sticking to "the sole custody system", which inevitably ignores children's rights, and must prevent child trafficking and children's rights abuses. We sincerely pray to make proclamation by ambassador
27/ 5 / 2018
2-16-23 hiuchi kawanishi-city hyogo japan
Research Foundation for the Furtherance
of global Human Welfare & Well-being
（ Child welfare&well-being organizations WELWEL）
陳情書
私達は大使様に、国連とG7 Summit 2018 の主催国であるカナダのIan Burney
大使に下記4点を「子どもの幸福追求権に関する声明文」として提出して頂きたく、ここに陳情致します。
世界が問題視している日本の「子ども拉致問題」解決を望むものです。宜しくお願いします。
記
日本政府は、合意、了解の無く子どもを連れ去る「一方親の罪」を認めるべきである。
合意、了解の無い子どもの連れ去りを先行した一方親は罪とならず、共同親権中であっても、後行して子どもを返還させる他方親は罪となる。それは実質支配権を単独親権の性格として高く評価する明らかな不作為である。
「共同親権制度」に日本の制度を変更すべきである。
「単独親権制度」は子の福祉と利益と権利を守っておらず、ハーグ条約を遵守出来ない。合意、了解の無い子どもの連れ去りを助長させており、子どもの国際的コンプライアンスに反している。
3、「離婚児童の国選弁護人制度」を導入が必須である。
日本は、人身取引、人権侵害、児童虐待を防いでいない。子どもは両親の権利に影響されず家事における独立した国家請求権を行使する権利が認められるべきである。
4、「人身取引防止法」を立法が必須である。
日本国内で「人身取引」が、公然と行われている。合意、了解の無い子どもの連れ去りを誘拐と認定せず、拉致犯が子どもを拘束した後に利益や権利を交渉する行為を容認している。明らかに子どもの権利を侵害している。
以上
親に会いたいと、親に会えない子どもたちが泣いています。
平成30年3月6日、EU諸外国の大使達によって、ハーグ条約を遵守しない日本政府へ声明が出され、私達は非常に感謝しています。（添付書類）
平成30年5月16日、米国務省は日本を、「命令を執行する効果的手段がない」ことを問題視した上で、連れ去り問題の「ハーグ条約」に基づく義務の「不履行違反国」に認定した。（添付書類）
「児童の権利条約」に照らせば、子どもの独立した権利を尊重する整備がなされておらず無策である。単独親権制度のもとでは、ハーグ条約は有効ではなく、子どもの自由意思や子どもの返還についても無策であり弊害がある。そもそも、同意、了解無く子どもを連れ去ることは、別居ではありません。一方的な別居であり、誘拐です。しかしながら日本政府は、ハーグ条約加盟国の国を跨いで子どもを連れ去った場合、ハーグ条約に違反しているかどうかを判断します。略取誘拐罪を判断しません。つまりハーグ条約非加盟国の国を跨いだ場合は、ハーグ条約に違反していないと判断します。当然、国内での誘拐も同様に、ハーグ条約に違反していないのです。なぜなら「単独親権制度」のもとで、拉致は容認されるのです。
このような弊害があるにもかかわらず、日本の法制度では返還を実施する効果的な手段がなく、結果として「不履行国」と認定されたのです。この問題の原因は、日本が「共同親権制度」に改正されなければ解決されません。「単独親権制度」の中では、連れ去った父親の実質支配権や作為された実質監護権を単独親権の性格として尊重します。つまり「単独親権制度」は、誘拐犯の権利を尊重する制度なのです。ハーグ条約非加盟国や日本国内の子どもたちは基本的人権を尊重されず、不作為が生じているのです。人身取引や拉致問題、人権侵害を照らせば明白です。
親から引き離された子ども達は、実親ロス症候群という精神疾患が生じる。
子どもを連れ去られた親は、実子ロス症候群という精神疾患が生じる。
「共同親権制度」は今や「国際法」であり、子どもと親の権利を守っています。幼い子どもは親の温もりを奪われて良いはずがなく、親が自分の子どもの未来を、自分の手で守る権利を有するのは当然、認めるべきであって、その権利を奪う「単独親権制度」は、正しいはずがない。
私たちは子どもの権利を守る為に、単独親権制度を廃止し、共同親権制度へ移行するべきであると日本政府に強く求めています。子どもたちが二人の親から愛情を受ける権利、愛されながら成長する権利、親のそばにいたいという守られるべき権利、二人の親に抱きしめられたい心の安定を望む権利、その幸福追求権は尊重されるべきなのです。
この事実を広く発信する為に、大使様には声明を要請したく陳情致しました。
私達の団体が注視している問題は、アジア諸国の子どもと母親の問題です。国際結婚が増加している中、ハーグ条約非加盟国の国を跨いだ場合は、ハーグ条約に違反していないと判断します。日本政府が子どもを連れ去った一方親の罪を認めなければ、母親から親権や監護権を奪い、子どもから大好きな母親を奪い、温もりを感じながら愛される権利を奪うのです。
親との関係を引き裂かれた子どもの精神的ダメージを見なければ「児童の権利条約」に反する弊害もある。単独親権制度は親同士の紛争を激化させ、実子誘拐を発生させ、子どもを紛争に巻き込む原因となっている事を日本政府は見逃している。子どもを誘拐した父親が、裁判所で公然と、母親に養育費などの利益、親権などの権利を要求し、その人質交渉が行われる。誘拐した父親に、要求した利益や権利を与える判決を下す日本の司法は、人身取引を幇助しています。
更に母親の人権を考えれば、司法が子どもを奪い、日本国への渡航すら困難にするなど決して基本的人権が尊重されていない。この不作為を見ずに解決しない日本政府は、人権感覚が欠落していえよう。
殊更、日本は両親の信頼関係が悪化する事を避け、拉致犯の精神的ダメージを優先する。従って幼少期の子どもの精神的ダメージは一切無視し、子どもが成人してから自由に会いに行くことを子の福祉と位置づけます。児童は幼少期こそ、両親から愛情が注がれる事を必要とし、心の健全な成長（well-being）には父性原理と母性原理の両方が必要なのです。
従って、日本政府は子どもの権利を無視せざるを得ない単独親権制度への保守、固執を見直すべきであり、子どもの人身取引、人権侵害を防止しなければなりません。大使様の善処、尽力を心よりお願い申し上げます。
平成30年 5月27日
日本兵庫県川西市火打2-16-23
一般財団法人 国際福祉人権研究財団
Secretary-General of the United Nations, António Guterres
Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Pierre James Trudeau
Proclamation
The Japanese government must solve the child abduction issue. Therefore, the Japanese government should respect “the rights of children who have been deprived of agree and without assent" and "the rights of parent that was separated from child without agree and assent".
We request the resolution as soon as possible with reference to the following proposal.
1, The Japanese government should admit the sin of one parent taking away children.
One parent taking away children is not guilty, but another parent taking return children in Joint custody is guilty. It is an illuminated omission that appreciates real control right as a character of “the sole custody”.
2, Japanese government must adopt that abolishes “the Sole Custody System” And should be change to "the joint custody system and Joint Parental Authority system".
Because the “sole custody system” cannot protect the child’s welfare, the best interests and the human rights and well-being of child. Given the essence of "Convention on the Rights of the Child", it contravenes children's international compliance.
3. Japanese government must adopt an essential new law "a system of the court-appointed defense counsel for child” by divorce ".
Child affected by divorce have the right to protect themselves. Compliance with the given the essence of "Convention on the Rights of the Child”, it is a necessary system to prevent trafficking of children, child’s rights violations and child abuse.
4. Japanese government must adopt an essential new laws “Prevention for children Trafficking and Trading".
"child trafficking by one parent" is admitted publicly in Japan.one parent negotiate profits and rights after detaining children in Japan. Because Japanese government do not determine the sin of kidnapping taking away children who have not agreed and no assent.
Obviously, Japanese government has infringed the child's right.
The Japanese government should improve conservatives, maintenance and persistence to "the sole custodial system" which inevitably ignores children's rights. We must look at the facts carefully to prevent child trafficking and human rights violations.
Children's rights are infringed in japan.
That's why we issue a Proclamation.
Ambassador of
＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿ 提出国
ＥＵ（全28カ国）
ベルギー,チェコ,デンマーク,ドイツ,エストニア,アイルランド,ギリシャ,スペイン,フランス,クロアチア,イタリア,キプロス,ラトビア,リトアニア,ルクセンブルク,ハンガリー,マルタ,オランダ,オーストリア,ポーランド,ポルトガル,ルーマニア,スロベニア,スロバキア,フィンランド,スウェーデン,英国
アセアン（全10か国）
インドネシア，カンボジア，シンガポール，タイ，フィリピン，ブルネイ，ベトナム，マレーシア，ミャンマー，ラオス
Ｇ7議長国
カナダ
「人身取引報告書（Trafficking in Persons Report）」調査機関
アメリカ
誘拐対策推進国
メキシコ,アルゼンチン,ブラジル,ウルグアイ,コロンビア,ペルー,ベネズエラ
中立国
オーストラリア,スイス
そのほか
ロシア,中国,台湾,ブルガリア,韓国,ニュージーランド,ノルウェー,日本
日本の各省庁に送った書面は、上記日本語翻訳を編集したものになります。
Comments